![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:37:27 +0000, Michael Houghton wrote:
Howdy! In article , Ron Lee wrote: (Rick Durden) wrote: Ron, It's interesting to read of your anti-safety perspective...the approach that if a pilot errs, he is sentenced to death. Rick, you completely missed my point. I am hardly "anti-safety." I am opposed to potential crutches that allow poor flight decisions to be rectified by "pulling the handle." It is very difficult to reconcile those two sentences, and you fail to do so. You use pejorative terms to describe the use of the safety system for the things it was designed specifically for (and delivered on). You harp on the pilot's culpability. To suggest that any error means death is unsupportable and a gross mischaracterization of reality. We don't know that either of these two events would have been fatal and certainly we do not know that a series of mistakes led to "pulling the handle." Better to concentrate on better decision skills than equipping all GA aircraft with a parachute. You suggest, by your choice of words, that the pilots in both cases had no business pulling the handle -- that their decision making skills were somehow defective. If you are in IMC at low altitude and you have instruments going haywire, you have a situation that can turn deadly in an instant, with no room to recover. You weren't in that airplane. You cannot judge that pilot's choice the way you are. You have no specific knowledge (any more than the rest of us) of what was actually happening. Reread Rick Durden's words about the adoption of parachutes in the military and observe how your words mimic the attude that had to be overcome then. I will be the first to admit that I am not the best pilot. But I will compare my decision making with any other pilot and come out quite well. I'm afraid that your words suggest a different evaluation. You demean the use of safety devices that have been empirically shown to work in the field -- devices that you are not being forced to use. yours, Michael Simply put, which pilot do you want to be? The live one on the ground saying words like, "maybe" or the dead one on the ground with a chute still packed and the last words spoken, "I can recover"? Which crutch would you rather use? A chute or ego? I'd rather be the "maybe" guy myself. Seems Ron would rather be the later. I'm with ya Michael! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
New Cessna panel | C J Campbell | Owning | 48 | October 24th 03 04:43 PM |