A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pilot's Political Orientation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old April 21st 04, 05:40 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There are many cases in which only "family" is permitted to visit,


So the solution is to change marriage? Wouldn't a better solution be
changing the visitation policy?


It's a single-point-of-contact solution. There are many hospitals that you or
your loved one might end up in, and changing all their policies is not an easy
task. It is porably not even possible to get taken seriously. What hospital
in (say) Montana is going to listen to somebody from Georgia who wants them to
change their policy just because one day they might break their leg while
chasing a cow?

There are many benefits that are conferred on "family", of which hospital
visitation is only one example. Some of these benefits are confered by law,
some by custom, and some by policy. It's a hodgepodge, but worked in the days
when everyone was pretty much the same.

Now that people live their lives in more diverse ways, the old rules don't
quite cover it all. When the mind and the customs expand, sometimes the rules
and words ought to also.


or to make decisions on behalf of the patient.


Wouldn't a power of attorney cover that situation?


Yes, in that particular case, maybe, if the hospital chooses to accept such a
document, and the document is drawn up within the guidelines of the hospital,
and you happen to have the papers handy, and the business office is open and
willing to process the papers. Sometimes (personal experience) you have only
hours to have things settled to get permission to visit or talk to the doctor
or be locked out the front door while your loved one dies, and all it takes is
one social worker who got up on the wrong side of the bed to really mess you
up.

For an (imperfect) aviation correlary, consider the case of instrument approach
procedure design in Lower Grasslandia. DHs are set up by law to be 250 feet
above the highest "Official Obstacle" for that airport. Official Obstacles are
defined as buildings, towers, gantries, and other structures located within
1000 feet of the touchdown zone of any runway.

This works for many years, because grass does not grow higher than buildings.
But after one particular international flight, shrubs and trees started growing
near some airports. There was talk about banishing trees, but some people
liked them and planted them near their houses, despite their being viewed as
perverted. But still, instrument approaches had to be designed and modified.
Eventually each approach had a hodgepodge of exceptions, none of them at all
consistant with each other (and some not even consistant with safe operating
practices).

The simple solution is to amend the definition of "Official Obstacle" to
include trees, shrubs, despite the fact that they were "natural occurances" and
not manmade "obstacles". It expands the IDEA of an "obstacle" in ways that
Lower Grasslandia had not even considered, and there was an uproar, which runs
to this day.

Ultimately, people started putting parachutes into their airplanes in case they
ran into an unofficial obstacle-like protrusion, but that didn't really work
very well and it spawned endless debates on their equivalent of Usenet, which
used up all the ones and zeros and brought forth the collapse of their
civilization. That is why you can no longer find Lower Grasslandia on any
atlas.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
Pilot's Political Orientation Chicken Bone Owning 314 June 21st 04 06:10 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 08:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.