![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There are many cases in which only "family" is permitted to visit, So the solution is to change marriage? Wouldn't a better solution be changing the visitation policy? It's a single-point-of-contact solution. There are many hospitals that you or your loved one might end up in, and changing all their policies is not an easy task. It is porably not even possible to get taken seriously. What hospital in (say) Montana is going to listen to somebody from Georgia who wants them to change their policy just because one day they might break their leg while chasing a cow? There are many benefits that are conferred on "family", of which hospital visitation is only one example. Some of these benefits are confered by law, some by custom, and some by policy. It's a hodgepodge, but worked in the days when everyone was pretty much the same. Now that people live their lives in more diverse ways, the old rules don't quite cover it all. When the mind and the customs expand, sometimes the rules and words ought to also. or to make decisions on behalf of the patient. Wouldn't a power of attorney cover that situation? Yes, in that particular case, maybe, if the hospital chooses to accept such a document, and the document is drawn up within the guidelines of the hospital, and you happen to have the papers handy, and the business office is open and willing to process the papers. Sometimes (personal experience) you have only hours to have things settled to get permission to visit or talk to the doctor or be locked out the front door while your loved one dies, and all it takes is one social worker who got up on the wrong side of the bed to really mess you up. For an (imperfect) aviation correlary, consider the case of instrument approach procedure design in Lower Grasslandia. DHs are set up by law to be 250 feet above the highest "Official Obstacle" for that airport. Official Obstacles are defined as buildings, towers, gantries, and other structures located within 1000 feet of the touchdown zone of any runway. This works for many years, because grass does not grow higher than buildings. But after one particular international flight, shrubs and trees started growing near some airports. There was talk about banishing trees, but some people liked them and planted them near their houses, despite their being viewed as perverted. But still, instrument approaches had to be designed and modified. Eventually each approach had a hodgepodge of exceptions, none of them at all consistant with each other (and some not even consistant with safe operating practices). The simple solution is to amend the definition of "Official Obstacle" to include trees, shrubs, despite the fact that they were "natural occurances" and not manmade "obstacles". It expands the IDEA of an "obstacle" in ways that Lower Grasslandia had not even considered, and there was an uproar, which runs to this day. Ultimately, people started putting parachutes into their airplanes in case they ran into an unofficial obstacle-like protrusion, but that didn't really work very well and it spawned endless debates on their equivalent of Usenet, which used up all the ones and zeros and brought forth the collapse of their civilization. That is why you can no longer find Lower Grasslandia on any atlas. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Pilot's Political Orientation | Chicken Bone | Owning | 314 | June 21st 04 06:10 PM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |