|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
April 23rd 04, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In article 5W0ic.19808$432.8732@fed1read01, BTIZ
wrote: Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew". My apologies to those rated aircrew for my misuse of the term non-flying. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KRMN ILS 33- Interesting Approach | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 21st 04 10:53 PM |
| high copper reading in oil analysis | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | March 26th 04 03:32 PM |
| FA: WWII Weekend 1991 Program - Reading, PA | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 6th 04 05:18 PM |
| Interesting Read | john smith | Piloting | 0 | January 11th 04 06:54 PM |
| ATC Privatization - interesting reading | Simon | General Aviation | 1 | August 31st 03 04:03 AM |
Threaded Mode