A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cirrus attracting pilots with 'The Wrong Stuff'?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old April 27th 04, 06:57 PM
John Harper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You've neatly taken this discussion full circle. (Beats what
usually happens with long threads!)

The original question was, how come this type, which on the
face of it is a perfectly normal, reasonable plane (just about
anybody who has flown one would agree with that) has such a
high accident rate per whatever? And a summary of the discussion
is, various people have opinions, mostly to do with the kind of
people who are tempted to buy a Cirrus, but nobody really knows.
Does buying a Cirrus suddenly multiply your chances of flying
into a mountain on the hairy edge of the scud? Seems pretty
improbable. Of the various incidents, only one is definitely down
the plane, and that was faulty maintenance. The rest all appear
to be pilot error (or just plain unknown/unknowable).

I guess we're done.

John


"Mike Money" wrote in message
...
Tom Borchert asks:

What does "have been flying longer" mean?

Mike: Cirrus SR series first delivered 1999. Lancair 300 series first
delivered 1992.

Tom: The Cirruses have flown way more hours than the Lancair fleet.

Mike: I don't know.

Tom: There are virtually no Lancairs out there in the field.

Mike: Cirrus has 1000 units delivered. Lancair has 1870 units
delivered.

Tom: These numbers are certainly too low to conclude anything from
them.

Mike: I agree.

I used the Lancair 300 for comparison due to the similarity with the
Cirrus SR.

I am impressed with the Cirrus SR. It represents a major advance in
design and concept for GA. Use of composites and state-of-the-art
avionics, not to mention the speed and rate-of-climb performance is a
giant leap forward.

I am perplexed to the negative comments about this airplane. There are
no stats to support a negative image. NTSB reports 18 total
accident/incidents, with 8 being fatal. Of the fatal accidents, one was
during test, and all the others were pilot error. If you review each of
the 7 other accident reports, there is nothing to indicate that the
airplane contributed to the fatality, and that unfortunately the Cirrus
pilots made the same mistakes made by other pilots flying other
airplanes.

Mike $$$ (PA28)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 12:47 AM
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. Dennis Owning 170 May 19th 04 04:44 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.