![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You've neatly taken this discussion full circle. (Beats what
usually happens with long threads!) The original question was, how come this type, which on the face of it is a perfectly normal, reasonable plane (just about anybody who has flown one would agree with that) has such a high accident rate per whatever? And a summary of the discussion is, various people have opinions, mostly to do with the kind of people who are tempted to buy a Cirrus, but nobody really knows. Does buying a Cirrus suddenly multiply your chances of flying into a mountain on the hairy edge of the scud? Seems pretty improbable. Of the various incidents, only one is definitely down the plane, and that was faulty maintenance. The rest all appear to be pilot error (or just plain unknown/unknowable). I guess we're done. John "Mike Money" wrote in message ... Tom Borchert asks: What does "have been flying longer" mean? Mike: Cirrus SR series first delivered 1999. Lancair 300 series first delivered 1992. Tom: The Cirruses have flown way more hours than the Lancair fleet. Mike: I don't know. Tom: There are virtually no Lancairs out there in the field. Mike: Cirrus has 1000 units delivered. Lancair has 1870 units delivered. Tom: These numbers are certainly too low to conclude anything from them. Mike: I agree. I used the Lancair 300 for comparison due to the similarity with the Cirrus SR. I am impressed with the Cirrus SR. It represents a major advance in design and concept for GA. Use of composites and state-of-the-art avionics, not to mention the speed and rate-of-climb performance is a giant leap forward. I am perplexed to the negative comments about this airplane. There are no stats to support a negative image. NTSB reports 18 total accident/incidents, with 8 being fatal. Of the fatal accidents, one was during test, and all the others were pilot error. If you review each of the 7 other accident reports, there is nothing to indicate that the airplane contributed to the fatality, and that unfortunately the Cirrus pilots made the same mistakes made by other pilots flying other airplanes. Mike $$$ (PA28) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |