A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old April 28th 04, 06:51 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:26:56 GMT, "Bob Jones" wrote
in Message-Id: m:

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message


I was taught to scan for traffic to the rear of the side to which I
intend to turn before making the turn.


That may be, but do you perform this scan in all quadrants in real-time?


If necessary.

Or only when you need it? My point is you appear to be placing a higher
standard on UAV's than are placed on existing aircraft/pilots.


That is not my intent.

By the way, where in Part 61 are the vision requirements specified?


He
[really long URL]


Ah, Part *67*, just as I thought. You were either lying or ignorant when
you made this claim:
"It's doubtful the...UAV operators' vision systems would function equal to
or better than that required meet the Part 61 requirements."


Part 61 (§61.23) requires the pilot of an airplane to possess a valid
Medical Certificate, so it indirectly mandates pilots to meet the
vision requirements of Part 67.

Why would you think I was fabricating the pilot vision requirement?
Do you hold an airmans certificate?

As near as I can tell, the words "vision", "eyesight" and "sight" don't even
appear in Part 61.


See above.

Further, you admitted elsewhere in this thread that you
have no idea what the capabilities of these systems are (yet more
ignorance).


I believe the UAV capabilities are a bit of a moving target, as its
systems are still under development.

But why let the facts get in the way of your quixotic quest, eh?


You haven't provided any facts at all, only personal opinion, so you
have no accountability at all to worry over.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 24 April 29th 04 03:08 PM
Thunderbird pilot found at fault in Mountain Home AFB crash Ditch Military Aviation 5 January 27th 04 01:32 AM
It's not our fault... EDR Piloting 23 January 5th 04 04:05 AM
Sheepskin seat covers save life. Kevin Owning 21 November 28th 03 10:00 PM
Senators Fault Air Force on Abuse Scandal Otis Willie Military Aviation 4 October 2nd 03 05:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.