![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I prefer doing long controlled mush descents instead of classic stalls
because it provides more of the really valuable part of the stall practice, experience with the aircraft at absolute minimum airspeed. Today I rode our 172 N down about 2000 feet with the yoke full back and the airspeed on the bottom peg. I was able to make gradual heading changes and rock the wings up and down with the rudder pedals. This is super practice compared to the fleeting moments of wallow you get in the textbook stall. I looked at the VSI and realized that my descent rate was within the range of a Cirrus with the BRS deployed. Of course, the Cirrus under its parachute wouldn't have had my 40 knots or so of forward speed to be absorbed by seatbelts and my face against the glare shield. The real value of the Cirrus system is the elimination of that forward motion and the rugged seats and airframe. However, deploying it in a 40 knot wind could change the horizontal motion part of that. Still, it demonstrates that flying a conventional plane in distress all the way to the ground provides lots of options for impact reduction. If I'd gone into treetops in the dark like that, I think I would have had a good chance of walking home. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|