![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rocky" wrote in message om... I kind of take it personal when someone makes a blanket statement that us old gray haired guys are incompetent and full of crap. Ol Shy & Bashful 21,000+ and still going - CFI/IRAM Gold Seal Speaking as a gray haired guy, all I can say is that the accident statistics speak for themselves. Back when everybody learned in tailwheel aircraft the accident rate was much higher. The accident rate for even tailwheel aircraft has gone down considerably with better instruction. In 1946 the GA accident rate was 77.83 per 100,000 hours of flight. In 1982 the GA accident rate was 10.9 per 100,000 hours. By 2001 it had dropped to 5.96. Fatal accidents show a similar trend downward. I don't buy the idea that flight instruction is worse now than it used to be, plain and simple. The accident rate says that flight instruction now is better. Anyone who says it isn't is full of it. I also stand by my assertion that the worst complainers are old guys who were poorly trained in the first place, have not kept current, and who themselves are a menace to aviation. Are all old guys like that? Of course not. But neither are all the flight instructors incompetent simply because they have not flown tailwheel aircraft, flown loops or rolls, have 22,000 hours, or have shot down five enemy aircraft. I know one guy on this forum who probably thinks that you should not be flight instructing, simply because you have more hours instructing than you do flying other missions. Apparently that idiot thinks the best instructors are those that don't instruct. Neither do I buy the idea that flying a bunch of different types makes you a better instructor. All instructors fly many different types, but if you look at their logs you will see that the preponderance of hours has always been in two or three types. That has always been true of flight instructors and always will be. It is a complete mischaracterization to suggest that flight instructors working their way into the airlines are 'wannabes' who are not real pilots. I know many such flight instructors and respect them deeply. I'll bet they have time in more types than some of the people who say that those instructors' experience is limited only to 172s. Airlines don't hire pilots who have flown only Skyhawks. I will put it plain. EDR's post was way off base. It was offensive. It was stupid. It contained a bunch of flat-out generalizations and old wives tales that at best are only slightly dangerous and at worst evidence of serious hatred. EDR owes an apology to flight instructors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |