![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if this is relevant, but given the broad range of model years
being discussed, it may be useful... I recently read an article about the evolution of the POH since the 1970's. The article touched on the changes to the format and the information included, but it also discussed the changing legal implications of the data in the POH. Is it possible that Cessna's changing attitude toward slips has been due less to changes in the aircraft and more to changes in the legal climate? "Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... On Thu, 20 May 2004 19:22:52 -0800, Dale wrote: In article , Bob Moo re wrote: Come down off your high horse sonny. No where in the airplane is there a placard that states "prohibited" about anything. Doesn't say anything about "unauthorized" either. I don't have the POH here in front of me at the time, but as I recall it does say something about slips and flaps during landing, but at 4,000' AGL, we wern't anywhere near landing. Depends on which year 172it is. I was looking at Info Manuals a while back concerning the slips with flaps stuff and found 2 years (66 and 67 I think it was) that do Prohibit slips with flaps. The year prior and the years after do not prohibit slips -- which is odd since there are no big changes to the airframe (the extended dorsal came along in '73). I don't know squat about 172s (sorry, I'm a 170B guy), but are you certain the 66 and 67 manuals say "prohibited"? I seem to recall (in passing) that flaps 40 slips were suggested to be "avoided" (way different animal than prohibited!). I belong to the camp that says flaps 40 slips is no big deal, *if* you're familiar with the airplane, it's limitations and your limitations. In my opinion, the early 100 series Cessnas (with 40 degree flaps) speak volumes to you if you're willing to listen. The pitch-over they speak of is very manageable (and easily avoided) in the right hands. The airframe/controls lets you know with plenty of warning when it is about to get unhappy, and when that happens, all you have to do is back off in the slightest amount, and you're back in business. I get the feeling the "avoided" mention in the books was put in there to weed out the nerds (and to aid in any lawsuits filed by same). That being said, if you need to slip a 100 series Cessna with flaps 40 hanging out, you didn't plan your approach right, and you were too high / too fast anyway.... grins Bela P. Havasreti |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |