![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ok. I'm going to break my promise to myself again because I'm just overwhelmingly curious about this. [...] the argument against top posting seems to be primarily one of etiquette-or netiquette. To me this is like saying that it's not proper etiquette to fly a high wing plane (or low wing depending on what you fly). IMHO top posting and bottom posting each have their uses, as does "nop" posting (posting a reply which, does not quote anything, but does address points in the thread). Nop posting works in some situations if the post is self-contained. Etiquette is based on the idea of making things easy and pleasant for others. To use the (not very good) airplane analogy, it's more like saying it's not proper etiquette to fly =passengers= in a low wing plane (because they can't see down) or in a high wing plane (because it makes them look like sissies* ). The focus is on the passengers. Personally, if the post lends itself I like to see a snippet of what is being replied to before I see the reply to that point, and then to see the next snippet before the reply to =it=. I do not want to see a whole slug first, and it annoys me to have to scroll down the entire post before I get to the original material. I often skip those (they are often followed by "me too" or by comments whose reltionship to the post requires me to go back and find specific things there. Posts come to servers way out of order, so the context is often needed. However, there are some threads in which the context is evident from the original material, or where the posts tend to be presented in order to most readers. In those cases, posting the reply first, and then the post being replied to for reference =just in case= it's needed, works best for most. However, on USENET, everyone is an expert whose Exalted Opinions (tm) must be followed by fiat. When this doesn't happen, sixteen million rulers come down on somebody's knuckles, in the name of kindness. Jose * well, I had to think of something! -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | October 14th 04 06:10 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Student Pilot equipment | John Stevens | Piloting | 31 | May 31st 04 03:04 AM |