Mooney successfully belly's in

Point taken. I think I'll have to read that book that tells you how to
crash an airplane.

Rick Durden wrote:
Dan,

The major reason for NOT shutting the engine down on a gear up landing
is that, after searches of accident reports, NO ONE has been hurt or
killed in a gear up landing in a civilian airplane since World War II
where the pilot left the engine running. When the pilot attempted to
shut down the engine(s), there were a number of serious injury and
fatal accidents.

One has to ask the question as to why a pilot who has an emergency (a
gear up landing) would willingly create yet another emergency (total
power loss), especially when he has never, ever practiced either one?
How many pilots have done prop stopped glides? Or have even gone
through the procedure to shut down and stop a prop on a single? By
the time you have slowed enough to stop the prop (if you can), the
descent rate at that speed has become massive...then, the pilot has to
stuff the nose down, further increasing the descent rate, develop
enough speed to either glide or flare and hope to hit the runway. Too
many die in the attempt. Guess they have to be thought of as a great
pilot for saving an insurance company some money (if it does so), and
there are always some at his funeral who will say what a great pilot
he was, even if he had just demonstrated that he lacked basic
judgment.

All the best,
Rick

Dan Truesdell wrote in message ...

I saw that in the Valley News yesterday. I hate to see a broken plane,
but was glad he walked away. A couple of thoughts crossed my mind:

1) Why didn't he go to BTV? Closer to Sugarbush, much longer runway
(with the wind blowing down it if it was from the Northeast). Military
crash units on the field (I presume).

2) Why didn't he shut down the engine prior to landing?

I'm not trying to be critical. I do recognize that I'm making these
observations from the comfort of my desk, not from a cockpit where I was
just slammed into the ground hard enough to break my landing gear.

wrote:

A Mooney pilot had to belly in his airplane Saturday at Lebanon
airport here in NH. All I know is from the newspaper's story. He had
flown up from Massachusetts and apparently was attempting to land at
Waitsfield airport, which is squeezed in between ridges in Vermont's
Green Mountains. I've flown by Waitsfield, it's a single runway
airfield where glider operations are popular during the summer months.
The two ridges form a deep valley and the airfield sits right between
them.

Saturday was an extremely windy day after the passage of a cold front
on Friday night, with winds generally from the northwest. Since the
mountainline in this area (if I'm remembering correctly) generally
runs from from southwest to northeast, this means that the winds would
be blowing over the peaks and then down the windward slope into the
valley.

The pilot reported that while he was flaring to touchdown, a gust
slammed him onto the runway damaging his landing gear. I gather that
he knew right away that the landing gear was damaged. He did not
attempt to continue the landing at Waitsfield.

He flew from Waitsfield to Lebanon and did several fly-by's while
attempting to lower the gear. Only one main lowered, which was
confirmed by the tower. Unable to lower both mains, the pilot elected
to retract the gear and land on his belly.

The landing was uneventful, although the three bladed prop was bent
back on all tips and there must have been damage to the belly.

The pilot, who was alone, was not hurt in the landing.

Corky Scott





--
Remove "2PLANES" to reply.