![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like to keep RPM in ground operations just over 1000 to minimize fouling.
This is always a compromise with brake usage however. Controlling speed by riding the brakes is a clear no, no. One suggestion a CFI made to me recently is to just leave the throttle alone, apply brakes briefly, let the plane pick up speed again, repeat as necessary. I had an idea today which worked well and I wonder if anyone sees a downside. I always operate our 172 N on the ground leaned to the max. Instead of using the brakes this morning, I just leaned some more until the engine sagged and controlled my speed that way. Turning the vernier knob didn't seem much more work than pushing the throttle in and out. Running super lean like that must be good for the plugs. I understand that early aircraft engines didn't have throttles, climbed and flew flat out, and then landed this way. That always seem clumsy to me but I can see now that it would have worked fairly well. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Owning | 69 | January 11th 04 08:35 PM |
Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |