A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Standard rate turn in Boeing 757?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old June 5th 04, 04:03 PM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Baker" wrote in message
...

"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
As for what they're capable of, remember Tex Johnson(sp?) barrel

rolled
the 707 prototype (the "Dash-80").


Actually, an aileron roll, Paul. I know his book, ghost written by
another, says barrel roll, but the tape shows it's an aileron roll.

Among non-fliers, all rolls are "barrel rolls," just as all loops

are
"loop-de-loops" and among Southerners, all Northerners are
"Damnyankees."

vince norris


Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape

numerous
times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23

continuous
ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day

over Lake
Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. He dove, he
climbed and he did a constant "speed" roll about a point which is

close to
the definition of a barrel roll as I can get without a book in front

of me.
An aileron roll is a roll about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.

He
did not do a 360 roll around the longitudinal axis.

Regards,

JB


I almost hate to get into this one again, as the last time was quite
unpleasant! :-)
It was a barrel roll. The -80 needed positive g all the way around for
the oil scavenger pumps. Tex knew this and I discussed it with him many
times through the years. Also, the airplane, regardless of how high the
roll set would have been and regardless of the airspeed at entry for a
pure aileron roll , would not have had the energy available through the
roll axis to complete an aileron roll without split S'ing out the back
side. The result of a pure aileron input would have been a HUGE split S
with serious airspeed problems on the back side!.
Tex did the roll the only way the airplane could have been rolled. He
FLEW it all the way around the barrel, keeping positive g on the
airplane throughout the maneuver for the oil pumps and to avoid the
split s.
Tex flew the prototype through a 3 dimensional roll at positive g , and
that spells barrel roll.
All the best as usual,
Dudley


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Boeing 757 turn rate? Garyurbach Aerobatics 6 June 14th 04 04:43 PM
Boeing 757 turn rate? Garyurbach Military Aviation 1 June 7th 04 05:48 PM
763 Cruising Speed. [email protected] General Aviation 24 February 9th 04 09:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.