![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kage wrote:
The new Seattle sectional and terminal chart have the TFR's mapped. I guess they are here to stay. That may be partly a result of the furor over the DC ADIZ not being mapped. While I agree that printing the "T"FR's on the sectionals makes them a bit less "temporary", they aren't made permanent simply by being printed. Keep working the system to get them eliminated. -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://pocketgear.com/products_searc...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 60 | February 8th 05 12:22 AM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | General Aviation | 12 | February 2nd 05 03:03 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |
Old New York Sectional | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 2 | November 25th 03 03:27 AM |