![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"kage" wrote in message
... The new Seattle sectional and terminal chart have the TFR's mapped. I guess they are here to stay. Putting aside the thread about whether they are really temporary or not, what about the depiction itself? They show: - Land areas white (i.e. no elevation information, but that's not a problem in these cases) - In the larger ones (where there is room for it), a thick blue dash outline - A small notation pointing to the TFR. Without the notation, they'd be easy to miss. Is that depiction standard for TFRs, or did NACO just make them up? I don't see a reference in my copy of the VFR Symbols Guide. -- David Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 60 | February 8th 05 12:22 AM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | General Aviation | 12 | February 2nd 05 03:03 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |
Old New York Sectional | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 2 | November 25th 03 03:27 AM |