![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com... Ah, I'd not thought about it that way. It's not a comforting thought: that I could be above a ceiling and unable to return to full IFR. There's no regulatory requirement that would force a controller to let a VFR-on-top-er back into the system? Not as far as I know. But, it's not an issue of the controller "letting you back in the system". You ARE "in the system". You've just chosen to apply VFR rules to your IFR flight, in addition to the usual IFR rules. Also, remember that the previous concern was regarding when you fly way off your route using the "VFR on top" rules. I wouldn't say that's an advisable use of "VFR on top", for the very reason that it might be more difficult to get back on route. Now, all that said, just as I've never had any trouble asking for "VFR on top", I've also never had any trouble cancelling "VFR on top". I stay reasonably close to my originally filed route, or I plan my deviation so that I have a good nav signal back to my route, and acceptable terrain clearance. I suppose it's possible you could ask for "VFR on top" to a particular waypoint, giving ATC some prior notice of where you plan to return to conventional IFR flight. That might give you some reassurance that you wouldn't lose your status as a non-"VFR on top" flight. But honestly, I can't think of any reason ATC wouldn't cancel "VFR on top" for you. You never lose your status as an IFR flight, so it seems to me that the worst that could happen is that a) you remain responsible for your own off-airway navigation for some time (if you're out of radar coverage, for example) or b) ATC vectors you in an inconvenient way for a little while, as they work you back into their normal traffic flow. You still have a valid IFR clearance and are still "in the system". I didn't mean to scare anyone off of "VFR on top" by my comment. It was more along the lines of "I'm not aware of any regulatory requirement that ATC grant ANY request by a pilot". ATC won't grant a request that they cannot accomodate with respect to the other traffic, but otherwise they generally allow pretty much whatever you ask for. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Routine Aviation Career | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 0 | September 26th 04 12:33 AM |
World War II Flying 'Ace' Salutes Racial Progress, By Gerry J. Gilmore | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 03:33 AM |
Flying is Life - The Rest is Just Details | Michael | Piloting | 55 | February 7th 04 03:17 PM |
Wm Buckley on John Kerry | Big John | Piloting | 22 | February 7th 04 02:19 AM |
Announcing THE book on airshow flying | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 11 | January 9th 04 07:33 PM |