![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Burns wrote:
Myself and 2 other pilots lease ours from a local DE. I did all my commercial and CFI training in it when it was available for rent from a local FBO. I don't have any experience in a 172 or 172RG, but I would characterize it as being very stable and nose heavy. I've found the R182 and 182Q aircraft both similarly "nose heavy". Adding a bit of power in the flair makes for an easy landing. W/o the power, it take a little more work but is certainly possible (a I've learned from power-off practice {8^). [...] The one we fly has the 80 gallon fuel tanks, so with full fuel it's useable payload is just under 800 lbs. What year? Our '79 has 88 usable. From where did the story that a 182 can carry what'll fit into it come? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Desktop Wallpaper - "United States Navy Summer Pulse ’04 | T. & D. Gregor, Sr. | Naval Aviation | 3 | October 9th 04 07:44 PM |
What I did on my summer vacation | Jim Burns | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | July 9th 04 02:52 AM |