![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message As I've said, the pilots I've checked coming out of these "crash courses for the Private" were safe enough, but lacked the overall abilities of pilots who had gone through a normal process I'm not a CFI so I don't really know what I am talking about but this is usenet so here goes anyway(!!!)...It is my impression that, right or wrong, most students are trained to proficiency in each task and then they are moved on to the next task. When they have adequate proficiency to pass the checkride they are signed off to take it. Most students (guessing here again) are mature enough to recognize their limitations and use their PP certificate to expand their capabilities and continue to expand their knowledge as well so the fact that they are not meteorologists or FAR lawyers doesn't put them at undue risk. If this is the case, there shouldn't be a major difference between the "traditional" method and the "accelerated". Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot Courses | John Stevens | Piloting | 1 | April 30th 04 09:11 PM |
Best GA Pilot Continuing Education Courses | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | January 2nd 04 07:54 PM |
instrument courses | Tony Woolner | Piloting | 0 | November 9th 03 12:31 AM |
instrument courses | ArtP | Piloting | 0 | November 8th 03 01:02 PM |
Wanted: Experienced CFIIs to Teach 10-day IFR Rating Courses near Pittsburgh | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 1st 03 01:50 AM |