![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the same question could be asked of any test.
There are clearly two distinct opinions on how to pass a test. 1) There's the "accellerated" camp. The way these couses work is to teach the student how to pass the test. A typical example is revising the question bank. Come the day of the test, the student knows whats required and without much thought or understanding just rattles off the answers. and then; 2) There's the "normal" camp. These courses teach true understanding of the material the test covers such that the student is able to draw his own conclusions on the material presented to him. Come the day of the test, each part of the examination presents a problem that requires solving. A student who understands the material covered by the test can then solve the problem. When you couple 1) with experience gained after the test, the student will learn why the answers he has memorised are the way they are - but there is always the danger that when a student under 1) comes across a problem that he hasn't memorised, his judgement, with lack of experience in solving problems, will be impaired. Clearly, when you couple 2) with experience gained after the test, the student is able to build confidently upon that experience because when a new problem comes along, this experience serves to reenforce his ability to solve the new problem. With that in mind, we return to the original question, and I'm not sure that there's an easy black and white answer to it. Either the written & checkride that is used as the sole measure to gauge pilot capability & proficiency is sound or it isn't. Given that graduates of both 1) and 2) can fly the plane to the required standard at a point in time, it is a sound measure. It's what happens afterwards that worries me. You only have to look at car drivers to see this - they all passed the driving test, but clearly not all of them should be on the road. A responsible pilot/driver will take additional training and advice as nescessary. The sad truth is, there will always be irresponsible ones that dont. Paul B 4 Hours so far! Cecil Chapman wrote: "Either the written test & checkride is a joke and jillions of "pilots" unworthy of the privilege are swarming over our heads or the test & Ride are effective enough to weed out the worst of us and send them back to the drawing board. Sounds like a sensible and direct question to me,,,, I too, would like to hear a simple straight-forward answer to that question. Either the written & checkride that is used as the sole measure to gauge pilot capability & proficiency is sound or it isn't.. .. So far the 'answers' to your post, sound more like the 'non-answers' from political candidates when asked a direct question. P.S. as a fellow IT nerd, I am rather fond of 'words' like 'jillions'... g |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot Courses | John Stevens | Piloting | 1 | April 30th 04 09:11 PM |
Best GA Pilot Continuing Education Courses | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | January 2nd 04 07:54 PM |
instrument courses | Tony Woolner | Piloting | 0 | November 9th 03 12:31 AM |
instrument courses | ArtP | Piloting | 0 | November 8th 03 01:02 PM |
Wanted: Experienced CFIIs to Teach 10-day IFR Rating Courses near Pittsburgh | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 1st 03 01:50 AM |