![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Suppose that the flight test were conducted three weeks after the last flight
the student actually took. Comparing the accelerated students with the standard curriculum students, which do you think would be more likely to pass this delayed flight test? My feeling (just that) is that the standard curriculum students would be in a better position, since their knowledge, gained over a long time, will probably remain a long time. The accelerated students, it would seem to me, would be more likely to have forgotten stuff over the three weeks they were not flying. OTOH, it might be that those three ("inactive") weeks would provide enough time for the information to gell, and the accelerated students would do better than they would have earlier. (whether this would be better than the normal curriculum students with a delayed flight test I don't know) Anybody with actual datapoints here? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot Courses | John Stevens | Piloting | 1 | April 30th 04 09:11 PM |
Best GA Pilot Continuing Education Courses | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | January 2nd 04 07:54 PM |
instrument courses | Tony Woolner | Piloting | 0 | November 9th 03 12:31 AM |
instrument courses | ArtP | Piloting | 0 | November 8th 03 01:02 PM |
Wanted: Experienced CFIIs to Teach 10-day IFR Rating Courses near Pittsburgh | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | October 1st 03 01:50 AM |