|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#32
July 22nd 04, 01:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Kaplan" wrote
So why dont' we see lots of homebuilts eliminating separate cylinders? They do. Look at Rotax. It is essentially the standard for little (Cub size and down) airplanes. Also consider the Leeza Air-Cam. It is a professionally designed airframe, purpose built as a camera platform twin for flight over terrain that offered few viable forced landing options. Engine cost wasn't really an issue. So what top-of-the-line certfied engines were used? Right, none. They used Rotax. Michael 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
| Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Threaded Mode