![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Megginson wrote in message . net.cable.rogers.com...
gwengler wrote: Yes, if you cancel IFR, Canadian ATC will give you the option of changing the rest of your flight plan to VFR. I believe that is incorrect. If I remember correctly, you have to file an entire new VFR flight plan. It is not possible to "convert" IFR into "VFR". Some years ago, I flew at night IFR from Regina to Saskatoon, got into icing conditions halfway, turn back to VMC and than had to air-file a complete new VFR flight plan. Possibly because of a route change? Here's what the AIP says about the issue (RAC 3.12.2): When flying IFR, use of the phrase "Cancelling IFR" results in ATC discontinuing the provision of IFR separation, but it does not automatically close the flight plan or flight itinerary. Therefore, alerting service with regards to search and rescue notification is still active and is based upon the information submitted in the original flight plan or itinerary. Because the pilot is now flying in accordance with Visual Flight Rules (VFR), the flight plan or itinerary must either be closed prior to landing, or an arrival report filed after landing, with an air traffic control unit, a flight service station or a community aerodrome station. Normally, I cancel IFR only when I'm close to my destination and want to avoid a lot of vectoring around for IFR separation, but when I have cancelled earlier in a flight, ATC has asked me explicitly if I wanted to keep my search-and-rescue time (i.e. convert to a VFR flight plan). All the best, David David, I don't want to be just controversial or too hairsplitting; however, I think you seem to believe that keeping your search and rescue portion of the flight plan constitutes flying under a flight plan or flight itinerary after having "cancelled IFR". Nowhere in the paragraph cited by you does it say that your IFR flight plan is now converted into a VFR flight plan. To be hairsplittingly correct, there would be some ambiguity, for example, in equipment codes: You are not "G" under IFR, but legally "G" under VFR using your handheld GPS. The case described by you is of course the most common. I almost always cancel IFR shortly before I arrive at an uncontrolled airport and usually cancel the search and rescue portion as well. Your statement "ATC has asked me explicitly if I wanted to keep my search-and-rescue time (i.e. convert to a VFR flight plan).", however, is simply incorrect. The "conversion" is not taking place. This is not at all relevant for day-to-day real life flying but it is relevant in the case experienced by me where I cancelled IFR about one hour before ETA. The routing and all other information was exactly the same IFR and VFR. Without re-filing in the air I would have been in contravention of CAR 602.73 (2): "No pilot-in-command shall operate an aircraft in VFR flight unless a VFR flight plan or a VFR flight itinerary has been filed, except where the flight is conducted within 25 nautical miles of the departure aerodrome." Anyone cares to comment about this from a US perspective? Gerd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |