![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 14:22:02 -0600, Newps wrote:
Peter Duniho wrote: I don't understand. I was under the impression that only the interior 3 mile radius of the TFR is strictly no-fly. Can't Kenmore simply get ATC approval to fly through the portion of the 30-mile radius that's affecting them? Here in the flat lands the no fly zone was a 10 mile radius. That was why we had a Falcon 900 landing on our 3800 foot runway. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Yes. The size of the no fly zone varies but it is highly unlikely Kenmore is grounded unless Bush will be within a few miles of their base. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
John Kerry in the FAA airmen database ( No TFRs yet for Kerrycampaign) | David Megginson | Piloting | 14 | August 14th 04 01:04 AM |
Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size - charted here | David H | Owning | 3 | January 10th 04 06:01 AM |
Puget Sound TFRs reduced in size, turned into National Security Areas | C J Campbell | Piloting | 4 | January 10th 04 06:01 AM |
New Year's Eve / Day TFRs 2003 / 2004 | Guy Elden Jr. | Piloting | 10 | January 1st 04 11:55 PM |
Presidential TFRs | G.R. Patterson III | Piloting | 29 | November 3rd 03 01:21 PM |