![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gideon wrote: In the US on Earth, the controller has to make certain assumptions. We make thousands of assumptions everyday. That #1 won't blow a tire is one of those assumptions, of course. In the 16 or so years I've been doing this I've seen less than 5 blown tires that required the aircraft to get towed off the runway. In that time I have witnessed well over a million takeoffs and landings. Others include that #1 won't slow a lot on final or dally on the runway. That happens all the time. There is no such thing as a go around proof sequence. **** happens. If it didn't there wouldn't be any need for a controller in the first place. And just to make matters "worse", I've been cleared as #3 or #4 to land. So the controller is making a fairly lengthy chain of assumptions (even on small planes, we're speaking now of 9 tires holding together {8^). What exactly are the tires you use made of...Jello? They just don't fail with the regularity that you are worried about. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|