![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Ash Wyllie"
writes: James Robinson opined Wdtabor wrote: The Nazi Party was the National SOCIALIST Party, fascsim is a left wing philosophy, it never has had anything to do with the political right. It is only characterized as such by entertainers with no knowledge of history. Someone doesn't know the definition of right and left. Right wing philosophies tend to be conservative, want to retain traditional values, and often advocate the establishment of an authoritarian political order. Left wing philosophies promote political change, and generally promote greater freedom and well being of the common man. Uh, No. Left and right and liberal and conservative have become distorted from their dictionary meanings. I can make it simpler. Look at the party NAMES. Do you want to live in a Republic, with unalienable rights not even the power of government is permitted to violate, or do you want to live in a Democracy, where there is no right of yours that is not subject to transgression if 51% of the populace lusts for what right protects? That is what the political spectrum is all about, the degree to wich the individual is soveriegn compared to the degree to which the collective is soveriegn. The order is, strarting with maximum individual rights Libertarian Republican Democrat Nazi Socialist Ants If you own yourself, and are willing to be responsible for yourself, you are a Libertarian. If you are owned by the collective, and expect to be guided and protected from your own failures by that collective, you are an ant. Pick the degree to which you are your own person or to which you are willing to trade away your liberty for economic security, and find your place on the spectrum. The only wild cards are the theocrats, who are collectivists who submit to their invisible friend instead of the majority. They are currently allied with the Republicans, but for 100 years before SCOTUS ****ed them off were allied with the Democrats. Note that theocrats are less dangerous when allied with the GOP, where they have succeeded in passing almost nothing, than they were when they were allied with the statist Democrats, and passed the Sodommy laws, Prostitution laws, Drug laws and Prohibition. An alliance between Theocrats and Collectivists gives you the Taliban, an alliance between theocrats and individualists gives you some hurtful rhetoric but nothing more. So, forget the spin and demagoguery, and decide where you are on the political spectrum based on the single matter of personal freedom vs submission to the collective and you will not go wrong. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Owning | 17 | January 29th 04 08:55 PM |
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? | Richard Hertz | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | January 25th 04 07:49 PM |
Differences in models of Foster500 loran | Ray Andraka | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:47 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |