A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More on the Sports Pilot/Medical Requirement issue



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old August 31st 04, 09:55 PM
ET
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Duniho" wrote in
:

wrote in message
...
From the AOPA website:

AOPA meets with FAA to work toward resolution of sport pilot medical
Catch-22


AOPA ought to go and actually read "Catch-22" so that they know what
the term really means.

Nothing undermines a legitimate effort more than using bad language.




Well, persistant incorrect use of a term eventually verify's the new
definition. While the Sport Pilot medical issue is not litterally a
catch-22 like in Joseph Heller’s novel, it "is" a Catch-22 as far as
common use of the term. Most of the Public see's Catch-22 as "your
damned if you do or your damned if you don't".

You can't fight the system and the system is us!

The Sport Pilot medical issue is simular for existing pilots who still
HAVE current medicals, really than for any other group. If there health
is at all questionable, they can choose to roll the dice on there next
medical, or just let it lapse and fly a 2 seater... so there damned if
they "do" go take a medical, in that they may not be able to fly
again... ever. They're damned if they don't, cause they won;t get to
fly that brand new SR-22 they bought a month ago.....

As far as current pilots that have failed medicals, ... as of now there
just damned... ;-)

I'm "certain" before Jan 15th there will be a one-time "sport-pilot"
medical that will probably involve more "how to recognise when you can't
fly" brochures, and a really long and involved contract absolving the
FAA, and the doctor of all responsibility when you go down in flames and
take innocent school children with you...., then actually proving you
can fly. If not, I would expect a bunch of older pilots who have lost
there medical for one reason or another that most of us would think is
silly, to get the ACLU or sum such as that and sue for equal protection
under the law.....

--
ET


"A common mistake people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools."---- Douglas Adams
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
September issue of Airman available Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 2nd 04 04:39 AM
Bogus Issue jls Home Built 2 August 15th 04 04:47 AM
Aviation Conspiracy: Bush Backs Down On Tower Privatization Issue!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 3 October 1st 03 05:39 AM
September issue of Afterburner now on line Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 9th 03 09:13 PM
What is this sports pilot license about? Frequent_Flyer Piloting 6 August 2nd 03 10:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.