![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iwan Bogels" wrote in message ... Well Dudley, In that case you could have simply written: "I hate it when people spread aviation crash videos for other purpose than aviation safety issues". It would have saved you a lot of unnecessary discussion. I don't believe you quite understand what's been happening here. I have absolutely no problem at all with people downloading to their heart's content from your site and viewing all the crash footage they can cram onto their computers. I merely saw what you are doing and posted a simple one line statement that expressed my personal feelings for both you and what you do. To reiterate, that statement was "I detest people like you". Everything that has transpired since then is simply the usual result on Usenet of people reading a comment like that and one by one, checking in with totally irrelevant comment. I say irrelevant because what they have to say is related to THEM, not to me. I took the trouble to engage the posters I wished to engage dealing with the reasons I had personally for "detesting you". This wasn't done to change anything, or even change anyone's opinions; simply to expand for clarity on MY feelings for what you do. I'm a slightly different poster than the usual you will find on Usenet because when I post, I'm not looking for agreement. Agreement isn't important to me when it comes to Usenet. I post what pleases me. If someone gains from what I say, that's fine. If they hate my guts and want me dead, that's fine too. Couldn't care less either way. So you see, all this fuss about crash video being good or bad is of no consequence to me personally at all. I could care less who watches crash videos and who photographs it and why. By all means, push your video and enjoy your hobby. It's quite humorous to me that this thread demonstrates in exact clarity the total reality of Usenet. You posted for your site......I posted that I detest people like you (note that this statement doesn't even address the "why" question or the video question)......then come the masses to opine with their own "opinions" on the matter, none of which by definition can address why I detest you, which is really funny to me........finally here we are again, after all this expended bandwidth, right back at the beginning. You have your site. They have their opinions. I still detest you. Nothing solved. Welcome to Usenet! :-) As you will have understood, I see things a little differently. Having witnessed a major aircraft crash in which 70 people got killed because a demonstration pilot misjudged the situation, I use it for other purposes. Bull****! You make no mention anywhere on your site of being even remotely interested in the safety issues involved with our work but as I've said, I'm not trying to change what you do. I simply detest what you do. I hope more people are willing to share their crash video footage with me, and I will continue to share it with other people via my website. Furthermore I will keep announcing the video wepage at the newsgroups where people might have an extra interest in viewing my videos. That would best serve my personal purpose. I'm sure you will, as I'm sure there will be no end of people who will make your efforts worthwhile. No problem with me at all Iwan. Go for it. People can download the videos at http://www.dappa.nl-crash.htm and use it for safety issues, I'm sorry, but just the video alone without a corresponding report does little to serve the safety issue. To serve the safety issue, video must be viewed in an investigative context by people who know how to evaluate that video. Putting crash video on the net for viewing by the general public with no expert comment directed at the safety issues involved with the crash does little but allow an uneducated replay of the crash. If you are indeed interested in flight safety, I would expect that the video from every crash you have ever shot had been turned over to crash investigation immediately after the crash, or at least a copy made and distributed immediately to proper investigative authority. When you can show me that this has been done by you, I'll consider not "detesting" you all that much. Until that point, you don't fit any description of a photographer interested in flight safety at all. You're just one more web site junkie pushing your wares to enhance your own image as a photographer. viewing pleasure, collecting purposes or whatever other goal they have. I won't judge them for the reason they look at it. I'm sure you won't, and I won't either. What people do is their own business, even you Iwan. I just happen to detest you that's all; no big deal....never was!! :-) If this thread had any purpose at all, it has served to enlighten a few to how we in the airshow community view the issue of crash video. For some, that will have been interesting. For the rest, who cares. Surely not me. I learned a long time ago that the way to change the world was DEFINITELY not on Usenet! Enjoy! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |