![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:%wC%c.132129$9d6.177@attbi_s54... Sorry, no sale! You made no mention to me about any ability to change your wording on your site until this moment, and it was by sheer accident I discovered those two words before joining you, which would have been a HUGE mistake for me. The only mistake you have made was not thinking before typing. I invited you to write an "expert" safety commentary on each video. This would have included pretty much anything you wanted to write. Listen up Jay, and see if you can get once and for all what I'm telling you about you, your site, and how that relates to all this crap you're trying to soft sell around here about flight safety being a "concern" of yours and how I could have "contributed" to your site simply by accepting your idiotic offer to me. I made it quite plain in my initial answer to you but since flight safety was never really your reason for making your "offer" in the first place, it must have gone right over your head. In viewing crash video in a flight safety context, to even begin to get useful data from that video, it takes weeks of intensive work by a team of experts using eye witness accounts coupled with more expert technical opinion from factory reps and technicicans before even a glimmer of factual information begins to emerge. There are literally hundreds of factors to be considered before one...yes, I said ONE single useful detail emerges that can be truthfully considered as a probable cause. After THAT has taken place, the same experts have to gather again and prepare a report that suggests the changes necessary to help prevent that SPECIFIC accident from happening again. Now, perhaps you can see why people in the flight safety business frown on people like you pushing the flight safety issue as the excuse for showing crash video on a public web site. The plain simple truth is that there is no flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos simply from the video itself. Sure, any moron can comment on the video. That doesn't take any brains at all; but it's just conjecture, even if it's from an "expert" like me! So don't try and push this "all you had to do was comment" thing at me pal, I know better, and I hope some of the rest of the pilots around here know better as well. Crash video put up on a public web site is simply crash video. You can spout off all day long about getting "experts" to comment for safety reasons, but all that is from a professional viewpoint is an excuse for showing the videos. You "invited" me to join you on your web site and I declined for several reasons. The above are the professional reasons. The personal reason was because I realized your "invitation" to me was simply a "put up or shut up" scenario, and I don't respond to that to begin with. Then, when I discovered you had the words COOL and ENJOY on the site, your "invitation" became the ultimate insult! No ligitimate person even remotely involved in flight safety issues would even consider being involved on a site like yours. If you doubt this, go find another ligitimate safety expert who will accept your "offer" to comment on crash video showing people dying on the same page as the words COOL and ENJOY; then come back and let us now who he or she is. I'd like to meet that person, and I'm betting there are others on this group who would like to meet them too. Just be advised that you and I are not on friendly terms any longer. I'll still be here, and there will still be a cold one waiting for you whenever you come to Oshkosh or Iowa City -- but not till after they've adjusted your meds. No thank you. I have no control over who I have to deal with on Usenet, but I can still pick with whom I want to share a drink. People who show crash video on commercial hotel websites under the heading COOL and ENJOY trying to involve my expertise to help sell hotel rooms I don't drink with. In closing, I have an invitation for you in front of this entire group. If you're all that enamoured with my expertise as a flight safety expert, and you have all this unbounded respect for my opinion on the issue that caused you to invite me on your crash page with you; and have so stated this high regard for my opinion on this newsgroup ; then after what I've told you in this post about the uselessness of viewing crash video on a public web page for safety reasons, let me now suggest that you remove all crash video from your web site nor that you know it has so little value in the flight safety context. As they say in chess......CHECK!!!! Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |