![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now, perhaps you can see why people in the flight safety business frown
on people like you pushing the flight safety issue as the excuse for showing crash video on a public web site. The plain simple truth is that there is no flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos simply from the video itself. First of all, I never claimed that my website had ANYTHING to do with "flight safety" -- although I offered you the chance to help change that. Putting that aside for the moment, let's see if I've got your new story straight. 1. You started this thread by commenting that you "detest" people who show aviation accident videos on the internet, because the videos have no connection to flight safety. 2. You went on to say that you were fine with these videos, IF they were presented in the context of flight safety. In other words, with proper commentary. 3. You describe yourself as a "flight safety expert" -- but freely admit that you're not "qualified" to intelligently comment on ANY of the videos. How is this possible? The videos on our website depict some of the most famous air disasters in recorded history -- yet you, an avowed "expert" in the field, with 50 years of experience, cannot comment? 4. NOW you're stating that there can be NO flight safety benefit derived from viewing these videos on-line, anywhere, ever? Pardon me, but your slip is showing. Crash video put up on a public web site is simply crash video. You can spout off all day long about getting "experts" to comment for safety reasons, but all that is from a professional viewpoint is an excuse for showing the videos. I had no intention of getting any "experts" to comment on any videos, until you made your entry into this thread. The videos are on the site because (a) I find them to be fascinating, and (b) they are extremely popular. Whether you -- or any other "flight safety expert" comments on any of the videos is of no consequence. I thought adding commentary was an idea with some merit, as long as you and I happened to be discussing the issue -- nothing more, nothing less. You "invited" me to join you on your web site and I declined for several reasons. The above are the professional reasons. The personal reason was because I realized your "invitation" to me was simply a "put up or shut up" scenario, and I don't respond to that to begin with. Doncha just hate that when someone calls your bluff? You were given the opportunity to prove to the world (or, at least, this little worldwide newsgroup) that you were indeed some sort of a "flight safety expert." You had a perfect opportunity to correct what you had announced was a horrible injustice, by helping to change our video page into a truly useful (rather than just mildly interesting) web page -- but, as expected, you instead have come up with a dozen bogus reasons why you can't do it. Then, when THAT bluff was called, you went off on wild, raging tantrums, simply to divert attention away from the fact that you really have no interest in changing ANYTHING -- you just want to sit on the sidelines, and throw stones. Put up or shut up, indeed. Your chance has come, and -- thankfully -- gone. In closing, I have an invitation for you in front of this entire group. If you're all that enamoured with my expertise as a flight safety expert, and you have all this unbounded respect for my opinion on the issue that caused you to invite me on your crash page with you; and have so stated this high regard for my opinion on this newsgroup ; then after what I've told you in this post about the uselessness of viewing crash video on a public web page for safety reasons, let me now suggest that you remove all crash video from your web site nor that you know it has so little value in the flight safety context. My respect, admiration, and honor were sadly and clearly misplaced. After reading your diatribes of the last several days, I can only thank God that you declined my invitation. As I've already stated, I will be making some minor changes to the wording on the page, as my time permits. As they say in chess......CHECK!!!! Have a nice life, Dudley. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
New Aviation Videos and a Rogue's Gallery Update! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 3 | December 28th 03 04:49 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |