![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried just using the IFR/VFR chart symbols. The good news is
my database went from 30,000 records to 15,000. The bad news is that every one of my routes now has missing waypoints. It seems that many of the IFR intersections are missing (ie. SACRI which is the intersection of EMI/272 and ENO/318). On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:37:17 GMT, ArtP wrote: I have IFR and Enroute checked, but I also have checked the fix types checked. I use about 30,000 records. It took quite a bit of experiment to get the fixes that I needed and take about an hour to get the data base loaded into the PDA. I just don't want to mess with what is working, however, if I were a new user I would much prefer the fix by chart type. On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 11:03:04 +0000 (UTC), (Paul Tomblin) wrote: In a previous article, "John Bell" said: As Paul Tomblin has mentioned, navaid.com will allow you to load aviation waypoints. You cannot load an entire database. What you can do is load aviation waypoints as user waypoints. Paul's site is great. I don't know about the 2610 and 2620, but you can then load the waypoints from Paul's site with several programs. Some of the free ones are EasyGPS, www.easygps.com and G7toWin, http://www.gpsinformation.org/ronh/. While we're indulging in a little self-promotion here, I'd like to ask people a question about my waypoint generator. A little while ago I got frustrated with the fact that the FAA data I get is incredibly inconsistent about the naming of fixes. It's hard to know what fix types to ask for, because what I'm usually interested in are fixes on airways, but the FAA only uses the fix type "AWY-INTXN" about 8 times in the whole country. Most of the others are called something else, but those something elses are also used for fixes I have no interest in myself. So as an experiment, I put a thing in the CoPilot waypoint generator to pick fixes based on what charts they appear on. So I pick ones that appear on IFR Enroute Low Altitude charts only, and I'm not troubled by all those fixes that are only of interest to people with GPSes, or which are part of Jet Routes, or part of an approach but not in the en-route, etc. I put that into CoPilot, and asked for feedback. And so far, not a single person has told me whether they like it or not. So I don't know if I should bother putting it in the other generators or not, or even if I put it in INSTEAD of the other fix type picker. Anybody have any opinions? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 44 | November 23rd 03 02:50 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |