![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PAW" wrote in message ...
wrote in message ... In article , "PAW" wrote: This is a BS question, but I'm curious. ![]() Not a BS question at all. You definitely could do this. Unfortunately, the hydraulic route will come at a price of reduced efficiency. You will probably loose 15-25 percent of your horse power. With this in mind, though, you can easily pick the proper size pump and motors to get the rpm of the propellers anywhere you want, with the engine running at what ever rpm it likes. Why heck, you could even put small motors on the main wheels and use them for brakes and to run the airplane backwards for parking. That would turn some heads. best luck, tom pettit I was looking at some hydraulic motors the other day and was wondering if a pump and motor could be used to drive a prop. A crazy example; two hydraulic motors and a couple pumps (powered with a mazda 13b maybe ??) to power something like a Cessna 337 in-line thrust type aircraft. Understanding weight would be an issue, I'm wondering how it would, or could ,work. I was looking at an Eaton motor that was rated at (up to) 3200 RPM @ about 120 ft. lb of torque. Weight was 20 lbs. They have a pump (48 lbs) that moves 42 gpm @ 4000 psi. Is it possible? Single place would be fine. ![]() That's a thought.... movement without the props turning. A Mazda 13b turbo can do 250-300 hp EASY. Power available for the pumps shouldn't be a problem. At least, *I *can't see how it could. ![]() There are some commercially built single engined hovercraft that use hydralic drive systems for the lift-fans. It allows excellent control of porportionality of the lift function separate from thrust. The upside is that it gives infinite variabilty and good packageing. The downside is that appropriate systems are pretty expensive and do add some weight and waste power but in larger craft this is not excessive. But keep in mind that the lift function normally requires around 30% of total power requirements in a large hovercraft and that thrust is 70% which is of course by direct,mechanical drive so the power losses from the hydralics are less significant than if used everywhere. I design/build racing hovercraft as a hobby and worship at the church of "Light and Simple." The biggest real improvements have come from learning how to make better components with composites. I have tried about a 1000 ideas (and kept a few) but most of the progress has been from making things lighter and better shaped - same as it ever was. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Warp Drive Propeller | Jean-Paul Roy | Home Built | 0 | May 13th 04 01:28 AM |
Warp drive or other ground adjustable props | Wallace Berry | Home Built | 0 | March 10th 04 04:02 PM |
The Dean Drive - was Antigrav | Felger Carbon | Home Built | 0 | February 10th 04 01:27 AM |
WTB VW Type I Reduction Drive | Alan | Home Built | 0 | January 2nd 04 04:14 AM |
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | December 21st 03 09:39 PM |