A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PA-23 Aztec



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old September 14th 04, 02:59 PM
Jim Burns
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.... on the other hand, several companies told us that Aztecs are prefered
twins to quote due to the excess power (but not too much) and easy handling
characteristics. We were told that they hate Apaches (underpowered) and
310's (fast sleek and powerfull)
YMMV
Jim

"Jim Burns" wrote in message
...
I can respond to this issue.

Myself I had just over 500 hours at the time of our purchase.
I had just gotten my multi rating.
I'm a CFII, (commercial, instrument, of course)
tailwheel endorsed
10 hours multi

1 other partner had over 1300 hours
commercial, instrument
single engine land and sea
new multi engine rating
40 hours multi

last partner was just private/instrument with 250 hours TT, no multi at

that
time

best quote was $4500 with $10,000 deductible for a gear up landing or
collapse.

First sweet spot is 500 hours w/ instrument rating
Next is 1000 hours

Several companies declined.

Jim

"Bill Denton" wrote in message
...
I haven't seen this touched on...

I couple of months ago I read a story (in Flying, I think), indicating

that
most aviation insurance companies would not insure pilot-owned light

twins,
especially if the pilot doesn't have very many multi hours.

I can't remember if the ban covered only new policies, or all policies,

but
it's something you might want to look into before you go too far.

Good luck!




"onsitewelding" wrote in message
news:07l1d.403688$M95.383968@pd7tw1no...
I would like to get my multi rating and then buy a light twin. I have

done
some research (very little actualy) but it seems from what I have read

and
been told that the piper aztec is a fairly easy twin to learn to fly,

not
too much of a maintenance hog and is a good solid aircraft. Not to

mention
that some of the older ones are not that expensive to buy.

I would use it for personal use only, kinda like a family air wagon so

I
don't want to be spending oodles of money just to use it. Does anyone

have
any suggestions as to the cost of using a aircraft such as this? Or

would
I
be better off looking at a good 6 place single?

I kinda have this thing about twin engine planes although I also

realize
2
engines = double the cost.

Thanks for your input!






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.756 / Virus Database: 506 - Release Date: 9/8/2004


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aztec Curtains and curtain sliders Jim Burns Owning 0 January 24th 05 05:27 PM
Gear problem in an Aztec PA23-250 Robert Borucki General Aviation 3 December 17th 04 07:08 PM
Any Aztec owners/flyers in the group? Jim Burns Owning 6 July 21st 04 03:47 PM
WTB: Piper Aztec C Jim Burns Aviation Marketplace 0 July 20th 04 07:38 PM
HELP! To buy or not...rough 63 aztec for $25,000 david Owning 27 January 15th 04 01:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.