![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Caravan has a 940hp engine flat rated to 675hp. Turbines are typically
flat rated so that the engine can make rated power to reasonable altitudes and temperatures without having to design the gearbox for the full thermodynamic horsepower. To keep the comparison with piston engines apples to apples you need to use thermodynamic ratings. http://www.pwc.ca/en/3_0/3_0http://w.../3_0_2_1_2.asp To put some numbers on things, the engines in my MU-2 have a specific fuel consumption of .55lb/hp/hr and a piston engine is about .45 and diesels can be under .40. Huge (ship) diesels can be under .30. Compare your model aircraft engines with the TFE731-60 used on the Falcon 900EX which uses ..405lb/lb thrust/hr Mike MU-2 wrote in message ... In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote: About the size of the Caravan 900hp+ Mike MU-2 According to the Cessna website, the current Caravan is 675hp. -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|