|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
September 23rd 04, 10:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote:
Early manuals gave a theoretical method of spin recovery, but it has been removed. The POH specifically says that the Cirrus has not been tested for spin recovery, that intentional spins and recoveries are prohibited, and that the only method approved for accidental spin recovery is deployment of the BRS. Sounds an awful lot like "won't recover from a spin and has never demonstrated recovery from a spin" to me. Nope, that's completely bogus. I have no idea why you insist on disseminating bad information about the airplane. The BRS is the only CERTIFIED method of recovery from an accidental spin. Conventional spin recovery techniques are recommended prior to BRS deployment. As such they are 'approved.' The airplane has spun plenty of times during development. -Ryan 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cirrus Deploys Chute Safely | m alexander | Home Built | 40 | September 28th 04 12:09 AM |
| Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | C J Campbell | Piloting | 122 | May 10th 04 11:30 PM |
| Another Cirrus BRS deployment: | Dan Luke | Piloting | 111 | April 19th 04 04:34 AM |
| Cirrus BRS deployment | Dan Luke | Piloting | 37 | April 14th 04 02:28 PM |
| New Cessna panel | C J Campbell | Owning | 48 | October 24th 03 04:43 PM |
Threaded Mode