![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just be sure you have a high tolerance for the military mindset. Remember,
if you discover a safety problem, it is not a problem and does not exist if mentioning it would embarrass a senior officer. If it really was a problem, you can be sure that someone senior to you would have already discovered and taken care of it. I joined as a maintenance officer and foolishly thought that it might be part of my job to review the aircraft logs and give the aircraft a careful look over. What I discovered was rather shocking. The aircraft were not legal. AD's were not complied with. Instruments were improperly marked. POH's were not updated with proper fuel consumption and weight and balance numbers after engine conversions. One plane was even missing it's ELT antenna. The coax just ran up under the panel and ended. I'd already learned that there was no point in reporting such things to Wing in order to get them corrected because CAP operates to the highest professional standards, has their planes inspected every 100 hours, and any problems would certainly be discovered by trained A&P's at the next inspection. Just before I took over, a plane was stumbling and losing power on climb out. Permission to have it checked out was denied because it was clearly the result of pilots adjusting the mixture improperly at our sea level airport and something that remedial training would resolve. (It turned out to be all except two bolts sheered on an intake manifold.) My C.O., who was quite sympathetic to my position, agreed that getting some independent verification would be helpful. I therefore, and with his approval, took advantage of the FSDO safety inspection which is segregated from enforcement action. They confirmed what I found and discovered so many other deficiencies that I was a bit embarrassed. I wrote up my report and gave it to my C.O. to take up to Wing. It happened to be pilot meeting night. Because the PIC is responsible for the condition of the aircraft, my C.O. agreed that we had to share the findings with the pilots. The result of my report and the pilot meeting was a blast from wing. It was announced that, "after extensive discussions with the FAA" the aircraft were found to be fully airworthy and I had overstepped my authority by investigating the logbooks and inspecting the aircraft. Since the FAR's require every PIC to have done this, I find it odd that a maintenance officer would be the only pilot not permitted to do so. My C.O. was then told to reassign me which he refused to do. Wing simply stopped answering my calls and emails which made it impossible to do the job so I quite and went on leave. A few months later, I resigned. I learned later that the planes were put in the shop and thousands of dollars spent on them. Personnel changes were made and, when the new maintenance officer calls up to say something it wrong, it gets fixed. Basically, they did everything they should have done and I achieved what I set out to do. Of course, I'm no longer in CAP and I would like to be because it is something I believe in. I don't want this post to be viewed primarily as a criticism or attack on CAP. It's really about the rank based, military, model of organizations. Making your superiors look good is job one. Safety and achieving the aims of the organization are jobs 2 and 3. When there is a conflict, prioritize accordingly. As I said shortly after all this happened, I thought at first that I had uncovered a pocket of corruption but I had really only uncovered a pocket of absolute normalcy. I just heard on NPR (and excuse me if I didn't get it quite straight) two FBI agents tried to point out before 911 that middle easterners that the INS had lost track of were taking flight training and there was talk about flying airliners into buildings. They were told to keep such fantasies to themselves. They went around their superiors and it was the end of their careers. 911 did not resurrect their careers. This story was in connection with Congress just declining to pass a law to protect such people. It makes me feel a lot better to know that Congress would agree that it is appropriate for me to no longer be in CAP. I made service a lot safer for the people I admire who get the call to go out and fly in the dark to help others. The price of doing that is no longer being able to serve myself but that is just the way of things. It's not a CAP problem, it's a problem of our whole culture. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bush Flew Fighter Jets During Vietnam | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 609 | September 11th 04 03:26 AM |
Dress blues needed by volunteer | John Miller | Naval Aviation | 13 | August 22nd 04 08:10 AM |
Bush flew fighter jets, but never over VIETNAM. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 159 | July 21st 04 02:22 PM |
Sun N Fun - Highs and Lows | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 29 | April 21st 04 06:00 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |