![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 20:43:24 GMT, "C Kingsbury"
wrote in .net:: There is a perfectly good argument to (a) have a regulation that requires reporting every PD and (b) routinely ignore it. Basically, you need to have the rule, so that you can go after a controller who reports nobody no matter what because he's lazy. OTOH, reporting every single incident when not necessary in the controller's view is just paper-chasing and serves no end. That argument begs the question: Who's subjective opinion determines which PDs are reported and which are not? The current system (if it requires _all_ PDs to be reported) is more objective. Don't get me wrong. I'm not looking forward to more PDs being reported. I'm just interested in enhancing safety. I think you are looking at the subject from a more realistic viewpoint and I from the more theoretical. If we don't attempt to strive for the best that we are capable, we will certainly create an imperfect system. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | October 14th 04 06:10 PM |
Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |