![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Oct 2004 03:00:40 GMT, (Teacherjh)
wrote in :: Objective does not imply intelligent, or productive. Perhaps, but it does imply impartial justice. I thought this was supposed to be about safety. Actually, the topic is the change in the "no harm, no foul" (NHNF = no loss of separation occurred; safety was not compromised) concept of enforcing pilot/controller deviations/errors as mandated in FAAO 7210.56, "Air Traffic Quality Assurance" 5-1-2 SUSPECTED EVENT, IIRC. That FAAO mentions: "The identification of operational errors and deviations without fear of reprisal is an absolute requirement and is the responsibility of all of us who work within our [NAS] system." The words "absolute requirement" are particularly pertinent to the change in enforcement Mr. Jones mentions, IMO. Due to the past NHNF policy, selective enforcement (an injustice) has occurred, as reported by Mr. Jones. If the FAAO were uniformly enforced, it would be more just, but probably unworkable. IIRC, motorists commit ~37 vehicle code violations on an average trip. If these were all cited and enforced, this would be a nation of court houses. It's not an easy issue. Controllers have an FAA form for reporting suspected PDs (Form 8020-17 Preliminary Pilot Deviation Report); airmen must write a letter* to the Administrator to report ATC operational errors. The NTSB has recommended that the FAA: ... Formally evaluate all reported safety-related events for potential air traffic control performance deficiencies and assign responsibility for the classification of all such events that occur within the National Airspace System to an internal oversight function that is independent of the Air Traffic Service. (A-00-36) Amend Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65, “Air Traffic Control,” (ATC) to require that controllers ask any member of a flight crew receiving ATC services who expresses concern about the proximity of another aircraft if he or she desires to file a formal near midair collision report. (A-00-37) Modify Federal Aviation Administration Form 8020-21, “Preliminary Near Midair Collision Report,” to include a section describing air traffic control actions relevant to the incident. (A-00-38) Amend Federal Aviation Administration Orders 7210.3, “Facility Operation and Administration,” and 8020.11, “Aircraft Accident and Incident Notification, Investigation, and Reporting,” to require that air traffic control facilities retain recorded voice communications and radar data for 45 days. (A-00-39) Amend Federal Aviation Administration Order 7210.3, “Facility Operation and Administration,” to require that all telephone conversations with personnel at air traffic control (ATC) facilities relating to an aircraft accident, incident, or ATC performance shall be conducted on recorded telephone lines. (A-00-40) http://www.avweb.com/other/ntsb0025a1.pdf Now it's about =justice=? This scares me. Why would it scare you? You are protected from your government by your Constitutional assurances, right? :-) * Sec. 13.5 Formal complaints. (a) Any person may file a complaint with the Administrator with respect to anything done or omitted to be done by any person in contravention of any provision of any Act or of any regulation or order issued under it, as to matters within the jurisdiction of the Administrator. This section does not apply to complaints against the Administrator or employees of the FAA acting within the scope of their employment. (b) Complaints filed under this section must-- (1) Be submitted in writing and identified as a complaint filed for the purpose of seeking an appropriate order or other enforcement action; (2) Be submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attention: Enforcement Docket (AGC-10), 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591; (3) Set forth the name and address, if known, of each person who is the subject of the complaint and, with respect to each person, the specific provisions of the Act or regulation or order that the complainant believes were violated; (4) Contain a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation; (5) State the name, address and telephone number of the person filing the complaint; and (6) Be signed by the person filing the complaint or a duly authorized representative. (c) Complaints which do not meet the requirements of paragraph (b)of this section will be considered reports under Sec. 13.1. (d) Complaints which meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section will be docketed and a copy mailed to each person named in the complaint. (e) Any complaint filed against a member of the Armed Forces of the United States acting in the performance of official duties shall be referred to the Secretary of the Department concerned for action in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sec. 13.21 of this part. (f) The person named in the complaint shall file an answer within 20 days after service of a copy of the complaint. (g) After the complaint has been answered or after the allotted time in which to file an answer has expired, the Administrator shall determine if there are reasonable grounds for investigating the complaint. (h) If the Administrator determines that a complaint does not state facts which warrant an investigation or action, the complaint may be dismissed without a hearing and the reason for the dismissal shall be given, in writing, to the person who filed the complaint and the person named in the complaint. (i) If the Administrator determines that reasonable grounds exist, an informal investigation may be initiated or an order of investigation may be issued in accordance with Subpart F of this part, or both. Each person named in the complaint shall be advised which official has been delegated the responsibility under Sec. 13.3(b) or (c) for conducting the investigation. (j) If the investigation substantiates the allegations set forth in the complaint, a notice of proposed order may be issued or other enforcement action taken in accordance with this part. (k) The complaint and other pleadings and official FAA records relating to the disposition of the complaint are maintained in current docket form in the Enforcement Docket (AGC-209), Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20591. Any interested person may examine any docketed material at that office, at any time after the docket is established, except material that is ordered withheld from the public under applicable law or regulations, and may obtain a photostatic or duplicate copy upon paying the cost of the copy. The full text can be found he http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text...13_main_02.tpl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | October 14th 04 06:10 PM |
Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |