![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message news:
...I realize that criticizing Langewiesche is an attack on a basic religious belief, but the truth is that some progress in understanding aviation has been made in the more than sixty years since the book was written, even if, as is sometimes claimed, the basic principles of aerodynamics have not changed.... Yup, that's certainly true. When I read the book as a student pilot, I was aware of it's age and took much of it with a grain of salt. That being said, I enjoyed it and found it of some use. The style of explanation in that day is sometimes more straightforward and works better with me than some of the more modern textbook styles today. I was able to get a concept better by reading Jeppeson, getting puzzled, reading Stick & Rudder, getting the idea, and re-reading Jeppeson to get the modern corrections. Yeah, I read a lot. Works for me, your mileage may vary. I'm reading some aerodynamics stuff now and understand the wing better, but for many purposes the idea that "the wing flys because it pushes air down" is good enough. If you're going to build wings or such that's clearly too weak, but for knowing how to fly it works. Perhaps I'm just a young old fart? -Malcolm Teas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|