A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Election saturation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old October 20th 04, 09:00 PM
Richard Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 20 Oct 2004 12:18:53 -0700, (John Galban)
wrote:

"C Kingsbury" wrote in message ink.net...

I wonder how they manage in Alaska. I'm sure plenty of the planes that go
into mountainsides up there received briefings that didn't say, "Don't fly
there today." Alaskans might not sue but I'm sure the families of all the
tourists who go up there are less understanding.

You touched on another sore spot I have with current AFSS system.
"VFR not recommended". After the FSS were consolidated in Arizona, I
started getting "VFR not recommended" statements quite often on
flights between Phoenix and Southern New Mexico (I average one or two
a month). On one flight, the vis was reported in excess of 20 miles
with an overcast layer 2,000 ft. above my proposed cruising altitude.
The briefer gave me a VNR. When I asked for the basis for this
recommendation, he told me that it was their policy to say VNR anytime
there was mountain obscuration, even if it would not affect the
planned flight. In my case, there was a single 10,000 ft. peak that
might be obscured, south of my route. I later talked to the
supervisor who comfirmed that this was their policy and it was in
place to cover their butts. I asked him if he'd ever heard of the boy
who cried "wolf". He didn't have an answer for that.

I haven't seen a benefit to talking to a live briefer in a long
time. The exception being the specialists in Fligh****ch. They're
still willing to offer meaningful interpretations of the local weather
situation. I wonder how long that will last.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)


I remember very well something that my CFI told me when I was training
and was concerned about being told VFR not recommended. She told me
that if I stayed on the ground everytime they told me that, I would
never be flying. I live in the Philly area and I can tell you that
she would be right, particularly in the summer. The boy who cried
"wolf" is a good analogy for me because I just don't llisten to that
statement anymore. I'll take the information and make my own decision
based upon what I see.
Rich Russell
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2004 Election predictions N9NWO Naval Aviation 4 November 1st 04 12:35 PM
More on Bush Election Stealing WalterM140 Military Aviation 0 June 20th 04 11:19 AM
Bush IS Attempting to Steal the Election WalterM140 Military Aviation 6 June 19th 04 12:30 AM
Bush has already won re-election SCE Military Aviation 11 November 19th 03 10:16 PM
Inside A U.S. Election Vote Counting Program Peter Twydell Military Aviation 0 July 10th 03 08:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.