![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Todd Pattist wrote in
: I disagree. "Expiration" is different from "revocation." The latter implies affirmative action by the issuing authority to withdraw the medical, presumably for cause. The former does not carry that implication. If you let it expire you did not meet the requirements to have the medical, so by definition it is either revoked or suspended. You can't use it. For the purposes of the LSA that is how it can be interpreted. It is one thing to allow a normal medical to expire, but anyone who has a special issuance, by definition, does not qualify for a normal medical certificate. The letter that you are sent when you receive a special issuance medical is VERY specific: "You are ineligible for third-class medical certification under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR's)," blah blah... "Not have had his or her most recently issued medical certificate (if the person has held a medical certificate) suspended or revoked or most recent Authorization for a Special Issuance of a Medical Certificate withdrawn;" Nowhere does the rule mention "expired." It refers throughout to affirmative actions by the FAA such as "suspended," "revoked" and "withdrawn." Todd, if you do not follow the requirements to renew your special issuance medical, the issue doesn't just lie in limbo, What makes you think it does? The FAA goes on to say: "These revisions are based on the FAA's concern that pilots whose airman medical certificates have been denied, suspended, or revoked or whose Authorization for Special Issuance of a Medical Certificate (Authorization) has been withdrawn would be allowed to operate light-sport aircraft" It seems clear to me that expired medical certificates, even ones under Special Issuance, are not going to prevent use of the DL as a medical. Yes, they will be. The paragraph above is part of the explanation of why the change was made at the last minute, without giving anyone a chance to have an opinion or complain!!! I don't have a special issuance medical, but even if I did, I'm comfortable that they would have said "expired" if they meant that everyone with a current medical had to keep getting one. That's not what they say either. Juan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 PM |
Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 02:49 AM |
New Sport Pilot Aircraft Website | Info | Home Built | 0 | November 29th 03 10:25 AM |
Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 03 05:21 AM |