![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
		 
			 
			#17  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
Mainly to protect thier dealers.. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	"Jay" wrote in message om... I have a Garmin product myself, and its a really a piece of kit, but my question is what are the reasons that make it advantagious for a company to set this type of pricing policy? (GaryP) wrote in message om... " jls" wrote in message . .. Well, I think you're correct: Garmin selling to retailers and requiring them to set minimum retail prices as a condition of selling to them is not a violation of the Sherman Act. It's not a violation either for us who consider the practice to be sleazy to shun Garmin like it is a skunk either. Absolutely! But if only a few of us shun Garmin it will have little or no effect on their policy. As I said earlier too bad UPS Technologies ceased to exist as an alternative to Garmin. Until a viable competitor comes along Garmin will continue to reap the profits of their success and mandate uniform minimum pricing from their dealers. GaryP  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |