![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Icebound" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Icebound" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Icebound" wrote in message ... "Dave Stadt" wrote in message . com... Nor does it matter if the plane was built before ARROW (whatever that means). He was wrong on all counts. ARROW are the current on-board-document rules: No, it is now AROW and has been since 1996. Yes, it is AROW for USA domestic flights, because the FCC has chosen not to enforce Station Licenses nor Operators Licenses within the USA. But they cannot extend such a waiver beyond their own borders and must comply with the International agreements, so it is still ARROW (officially) for cross-border flights. Technically, it is only ARROW for cross-border flights *into* the US. Canada, most Caribbean countries, and Mexico no longer require radio licenses. Even so, you could technically get around ARROW by simply turning off your radio when crossing the border. Once on the other side of the border, you are safe in turning it back on. :-) That is not correct. Canada does not require a station license within its borders, just as the USA does not within its borders. But the Canadian rule only affects Canadians in Canada, not Canadians flying abroad, nor foreign nationals flying into Canada. The same applies for the USA rule... it only applies to US nationals within the USA. But any Canadian-registered flight from Canada to the USA (or any other country) requires a license under Canadian (and International) rules, just as any US-registered flight from the US to Canada (or any other country) requires a license under USA (and International) rules. Canada and the USA were trying to negotiate a reciprocal agreement to avoid that requirement, but based on the last announcement that I saw, it was never signed, and the official position remains that the license is required. The license requirement does not necessarily have anything to do with the wishes of the individual countries; It is an international requirement for International flights. And until the two countries get their act together and sign the agreement, they are supposed to abide by the international agreement...ie: a station license *is* required. Now, having said that, whether they choose to actually *enforce* the rule is another issue. However, Canadians have been warned by their Radio authority that their station license paperwork should be up-to-date upon entering the USA... because of the rule, but also in part because of 9/11 and the extra level of ID that the license will provide. Certainly a radio station license is a guaranteed way to stop terrorism. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
~ IS IT ILLEGAL TO REQUEST THAT SOMEONE > KILL BUSH< ? | B2431 | Military Aviation | 1 | September 20th 04 03:01 PM |
on US/UK illegal spying in UN SC | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 1 | February 17th 04 07:28 PM |
bushies file illegal flight plan | Gordon | Naval Aviation | 33 | January 13th 04 08:05 PM |
bushies file illegal flight plan | JamesF1110 | Naval Aviation | 1 | December 8th 03 12:06 AM |
40,000 U$ Soldiers are Illegal Aliens, Drafted for Illegal War | Gordon | Military Aviation | 6 | September 7th 03 03:28 AM |