![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:06:55 -0700, "Richard Isakson" wrote: (ii) 1,320 pounds (600 kilograms) for aircraft not intended for operation on water; or Cool...almost a hundred pounds higher than they originally were talking about. This lets the Ercoupes in. If you look at EAA's old "These planes don't qualify" section on this page... http://www.sportpilot.org/lsa/standard_certificate_aircraft.html ...you'll see there are some Aeroncas, T-Carts, and even a J-3 model that now qualify. So here's a question. Many certificated aircraft have multiple gross weights, one for normal category, and another for utility. If the normal category gross weight is over 1320 pounds, and the utility category weight is under, can I fly it as a LSA if I operate it only in the "utility" category? BTW, the rule specifies only "maximum takeoff weight" less than 1320 lbs, not "maximum *certificated* takeoff weight" In the preamble text, it defines "maximum weight" as empty weight+passengers+baggage+full fuel. Can I compute my own "maximum takeoff weight", based on the flight requirements? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 04:22 PM |
Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 02:49 AM |