![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 at 03:20:38 in message
, Capt.Doug wrote: No, less air, because the density of the ambient air is less as altitude rises. Less air in the front means less air out the back (though the pressure ratio can be the same). Jet engines produce less thrust at altitude. There is less cooling air which means that maximum exhaust temperature is reached at a lower thrust. The efficiency gains come from the forward speed of the engine (sort of a ram effect) and the lower aerodynamic drag at altitude (higher true airspeed). This interests me as it is often said, the idea of less drag at altitude presumably comes from the idea that drag depends on air density? Which of course it does. However if you fly for maximum range than you fly close to maximum lift/drag ratio which depends only on getting the correct alpha (ignoring compressibility effects). So since lift = weight, drag depends on weight and it reduces as fuel is burned. The aircraft flies faster to create the lift at altitude but the drag is presumably almost the same? Am I wrong? -- David CL Francis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|