![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chip Jones" wrote in message
You know how many controllers? Are you saying there's a consensus on this? I know, quite literally, over five hundred controllers. I have also served as a union drug testing rep for NATCA. I am saying that this opinion is the overwhelming consensus on this in 100% of the controllers whose hands I held while they were peeing in a bottle. How about you, Spiccoli? And you know they weren't lying? It would be foolish to raise a flag by stating otherwise, no? So what? Critical safety skills *are* an issue and *can* be tested. If that's your point, then drug testing isn't the way to go. You can't always know lots of things about people. Nor should you. There are lots of highly motivated people who smoke pot. Ok brother, lay it on us. How *can* you test for on the job or in the cockpit drug impairment without a freaking drug test??? The issue above was "critical safety skills". Do try to keep up. Those can be tested. Drug testing doesn't test for drug impairment, BTW. But habitual drug users aren't motivated to give a rats ass about much more than getting high. Who was talking about "habitual drug users"? The issue was impairment. What about zero tolerance for smoking, drinking and boxing? You OK with that? I am opposed to all snip 10 lines of evasion Who cares what you are personally opposed to? The issue wasn't using drugs on the job. You sure you're not a bit stoned now? You're having trouble following this. The issue is government control and testing. So, you OK with random testing for boxing, smoking and drinking? I personally don't give a rat's ass one way or the other about smoking, drinking or boxing away from the cockpit, hanger, radar room or tower cab. So why the occasional joint? What's so special about that? I vote for chicken ****. Kinda like a guy who doesn't have the stones to put his real name on a post. Ahh, so all posters who use a nickname are chicken ****? Is that what you're saying? Godlike. You'll note that I don't post from an anonymous source or hide my email. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Testing Stick Ribs | Bob Hoover | Home Built | 3 | October 3rd 04 02:30 AM |
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 20 | July 2nd 04 04:09 PM |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 07:31 PM |