![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My problem with Class D space is that it seems to impart an
inappropriate comfort level to many pilots who don't understand what is (and is not) being provided. This would be because pilots, like all other people, have this idea that authority and responsibility go together. In other words, if the controller has the authority to tell you how to fly your pattern, when to turn, etc - then the responsibility for separation in the air should also be his. Well, it doesn't work that way. THAT is the primary weakness of Class D airspace, and it can't be fixed unless you either make the controller responsible for separation (meaning that unless the pilot disregarded the controller's instructions, it's controller error, not pilot error, in the event of a mid-air or near miss) or you give the pilot the authority to disregard the controller's instructions at will, not just in the event of an emergency (thus making the airspace uncontrolled). But while this is an issue in theory, in practice it's usually not an issue. In reality, at most Class D's most controllers treat separation as if it were their responsibility. That means they issue clear and comprehensible instructions and ask for a readback of the key points, just as if they were issuing clearances. When that happens, pilots treat the instructions as if they were clearances - meaning they question those they don't understand, read back those they do, and comply - and things work OK - a little better than they would if the airspace was uncontrolled. Sometimes you get a bad or overloaded controller, and then things are MUCH worse than they would be if the airspace was uncontrolled. That's when you get the problems. I will be the first to admit that I will let a situation that looks ugly develop a lot further in Class D than I will in Class E or G. I Class E/G, I know there's nobody looking out for me but me, and if I don't have a plan nobody does. So when I see things not going to plan (someone too close for comfort) I take action immediately. Not so in Class D. Unless the controller has given me reason to doubt his competence (by doing things like issuing nonsensical or illegal instructions, chewing out pilots on the frequency rather than calmly giving them a number to call, and generally acting like he lost SA) I'm going to assume he has a plan, and I'm going to stick with his plan until there's just no way. I think most pilots would too. I guess this is what you call inappropriate comfort level. You are of course entitled to your opinion, but I don't consider it inappropriate given the way Class D normally operates. Given the legalities, you have a point. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
Negative XPDR - under the outer ring of Class C | bcjames | Piloting | 8 | August 30th 04 11:49 PM |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Overlapping class C & D | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 14 | May 6th 04 04:08 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |