![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know that a car's engine needs to be mated to the transmission for
propulsion. This I know isn't the case with an aircraft with a jet engine; if the engine is turned on without the brakes applied, the jet of air leaving the engine will hurl the craft forward. My doubt is, why does this forward motion effect not occur during push-back, when the engines are normally turned on? Is it because at low revs the engine would lack the punch to initiate the forward motion of a heavy aircraft? If not, I'd imagine the push-back becomes a bit of a tiresome affair by the time it's over... Sorry if this is infuriatingly elementary, but I need to ask somewhere ![]() Ramapriya |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 05:36 PM |