A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is a "Forward Skip"?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 7th 05, 03:52 AM
Mike Rhodes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:34:48 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

"kontiki" wrote in message
...
In theory of course. In the case of the 172 with 40 degrees of flaps they
contribute more drag than lift.


In practice too. The relative amounts of drag and lift are irrelevant to
the fact that using the flaps lowers the stall speed, and that doing so does
not make it any easier "to end up real slow in a slip".

Your assertion that "With full flaps its easy to end up real slow in a slip
and approach a stall" is just plain nonsense, and certainly has nothing to
do with the *warning* (not prohibition) against slipping while flaps are
extended (even if there were something to your claim about flaps making it
easier to stall).

Pete


Odd, but interesting thread. I haven't heard of tail stall before.
But if I've got the basics correct, don't flaps allow the aircraft to
fly at slow airspeeds with a lower angle of attack, including both
wing and tailplane? So flaps should reduce the likelihood of any
stall, provided enough power is applied to those draggy 40 deg
settings. The wing stalls at a specific angle of attack, and I don't
think the flaps change that characteristic; not that it has been
suggested anywhere.

I may be wrong, but isn't this one reason why airliners need flaps at
landing? So they don't bounce the tail on touchdown? Or more likely
so the pilot can see the landing area; aside from just reducing
required runway length.
--
Mike
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Don't skip that runup! Roger Long Piloting 8 July 8th 04 07:04 PM
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 EmailMe Home Built 70 June 21st 04 09:36 PM
B-17 forward guin positions zxcv Military Aviation 13 March 16th 04 12:04 AM
Forward Swept Wings Canuck Bob Home Built 16 October 3rd 03 05:50 PM
Honor to those who came forward ArtKramr Military Aviation 51 July 7th 03 11:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.