![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sriram Narayan wrote:
It doesn't look that linear to me. I found a website with a similar graph and it appears that at sea level and at 10000ft the slope of the curve is at least 2x different. Your curve is quite a bit more linear (maybe 20% increase in slope at 10k). There must some sort of mechanical compensation involved otherwise altimeters would be off quite a bit even at 10k (even with your curve). Isn't it something like 75ft accuracy requirement for altimeters? http://www.atmosphere.mpg.de/enid/16h.html His graph has more curvature than mine does because his covers a much greater vertical distance (11000 meters is around 36000 feet). Mine only goes to 18000 feet. But I agree that a linear assumption will result in a worst-case error of several hundred feet. Not good enough, so the nonlinearity must be built into altimeters even if the're only good to 20000 ft. Jim Rosinski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|