![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Larry Dighera posted:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:41:39 GMT, "Neil Gould" wrote in :: As I was taught, the point of flying safely is to always have a viable option. So, I fly tight patterns and make power-off landings as a rule. If I make it to the pattern, I can make it to a runway, engine or no. Truly? So when you're #5 in the pattern (which necessitates a looooong, extended downwind leg) you just fly the pattern at 2,000' then? Of course not, one has to use common sense, for example, fly the pattern slower rather than lower or hold altitude on that "looooong, extended downwind leg" rather than descend after crossing the usual abeam point and turn base within gliding range. If you don't guarantee that you can make the runway, who will? ;-) Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" | Jim Cummiskey | Piloting | 86 | August 16th 04 06:23 PM |
Diesel engine | Bryan | Home Built | 41 | May 1st 04 07:23 PM |
Night engine failure in Boston | Dan Luke | Piloting | 8 | February 13th 04 05:33 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |