A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

another airport that may go down (BDR)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old January 31st 05, 01:27 PM
Robert Chambers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I doubt that the decision was based solely on thumbing the CT
representatives in the eye but it certainly would look like that I think.

Bridgeport has no real economy, they knocked down a long-defunct
manufacturing plant to build a baseball field and indoor arena and then
knocked down some projects to make carparks for them.

There are hardly any manufacturing jobs in Bridgeport anymore and those
that are left are either small-time specialty shops or are shipping
their work overseas.

There are acres and acres of prime waterfront available in Bridgeport,
which incidentally is a pretty good deep water port. What was the
latest great idea for the area? A friggin casinio. forward thinkers
they are NOT.

And do I think the airport will be there in 5 years? Yes, I think it
will be. This proposal will go the way of the last one (to build a
casino on the airport property)...

Robert

H.P. wrote:

The decision on the Prez' chopper was undoubtedly a thumb in the eye payback
to the rabid anti-Bush Democrats that dominate CT national politics in the
region, in particular Dodd, Lieberman and DeLauro (3rd Congressional
District). Now these clowns are all in a dither to try to explain the
decision, blaming it on everybody except themselves. The contract value was
not all that big for Sikosky, but the symbolism...its the first time the
Prez will be flying around in a non-Sikorsky chopper.

No way that Bridgeport will close BDR down, if for no other reason than to
tweak Stratford's nose. But it'll be the final nail in Bridgeport's economic
coffin if they do.

The airport is woefully underutilized. If the region had some decent
corporate activity, that place would be buzzing busy, just as it was as
late as the mid-eighties when it had scheduled regionals.

I read a while ago that Bob Crandall was considering basing his new air taxi
operation, POGO, at BDR.




"Robert Chambers" wrote in message
. com...

I'm based at BDR and there's a lot more to this story than meets the eye.

The airport is actually in the town of Stratford but the city of
Bridgeport owns it. Stratford wanted some tax money for it as it is quite
a few acres of property. Bridgeport said "we are a municipal
organization, we don't have to pay property taxes" so Stratford took them
to court and the court sided with Bridgeport so it's been a ****ing match
ever since.

What Stratford doesn't realize is that Bridgeport is not going to be
handing back to the FAA any grant money, they don't have it to spare.

Bridgeport has lost pretty much all the manufacturing jobs it ever had,
there are factory buildings and warehouses standing empty and loads of
vacant space waiting for people to build something on it. There's no
demand for space in the Bridgeport area. Transportation is a disaster
here with I-95 choked with traffic and construction. Labor costs are high
and Connecticut has a pretty business-unfriendly unemployment-insurance
setup compared to other states. Most of the manufacturing jobs have gone
out of the country or down south. Hell, even the presidential helicopter
got awarded to Lockheed who are in bed with some overseas outfits (who
will wind up making parts for it).

The Urban Land Institute aparrently looked at the land and came up with
this proposal pretty quickly so you know how much thought went into it.

Across the street from the airport is the old Avco-lycoming factory where
until 6 or so years ago they built the turbine engines for the tanks.
That whole property except for a few small companies is sitting empty and
idle. There's no demand for manufacturing space.

This is just a politicians way to try and make some brownie points with
the constituents. They figure that the voters in town would rather have a
bunch of warehouses and tractor-trailers in their neighborhoods instead of
the few aircraft and very little auto traffic.

Robert



AirMan wrote:


http://www.nhregister.com/site/news.... 517515&rfi=8


http://www.connpost.com/Stories/0,14...earch=filt er



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
N94 Airport may expand into mobile home community, locals supportive William Summers Piloting 0 March 18th 04 03:03 AM
Rules on what can be in a hangar Brett Justus Owning 13 February 27th 04 05:35 PM
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! Jay Honeck Home Built 18 January 20th 04 04:02 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.